Test your understanding of writing strong discussion posts
The chapter clearly states that "The goal of these assignments is to promote conversation and idea sharing." Discussion posts are meant to facilitate academic dialogue among students.
The chapter states that "You'll typically respond to a prompt and be asked to show critical thinking and provide evidence for your ideas." These are the two essential components of a strong discussion post.
The chapter says a big idea should be "Interesting, Consequential, Debatable, Specific." If something is universally accepted, it wouldn't be debatable, which is one of the required characteristics.
The chapter states that the topic sentence is "your opportunity to state your position about the prompt. Be clear and direct." This sets up your entire argument.
The format sequence is: 1) State the big reason, 2) Go deeper with depth and background, 3) Provide argument in your own words, 4) Provide evidence from research.
The chapter distinguishes between "provide an argument- a defense of your claim in your own words" and "provide evidence- a defense of your claim from someone else (that you learned via research)."
The chapter states that the "Tie It In" section should "add a sentence that explains how your claims build a strong case for your position." This brings your argument together cohesively.
The example explains that "One major way that community radio supports the public is through underwriting. This is a form of advertising in which radio hosts read a short message about a local organization in exchange for a donation to the station."
The example states that "A single 30-second commercial advertising spot purchased from DX Direct costs businesses around $400 (DX Media, 2018)." This is contrasted with the lower cost of underwriting on community radio.
The chapter notes that "Creating a strong response for these assignments is an important skill that can translate to many other settings in the workforce and in social life." This transferable skill is the ability to construct logical, evidence-supported arguments.